Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44179/2018bail granted

Md. Raunak @ Md Raunak Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44179 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2018 Thana -BANGRA District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. MD. RAUNAK @ MD RAUNAK ALI S/o Md. Tallib Hussain, R/o Vill.- Paharpur, P.S.- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2018 in connection with Bangara P.S. Case No. 48 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 34, 38, 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation as per F.I.R. is of recovery of 896 liters liquor from the Pickup van.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody for more than four month and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and also considering that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44179 of 2018 (4) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-6th cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Samastipur, District Samastipur, in connection Bangara P.S. Case No. 48 of 2018, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad U T