Patna High CourtCWJC/854/2015disposed

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-08Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.854 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar son of Sri Baidyanath Prasad, Resident of Bank Colony, Najirpur, P.O.- Shekhpur, P.S.- Yahiapur, District- Muzaffarpur at present Panchayat Teacher in Prathamik Vidyalaya, Banaul Sokhera, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Principal Secretary, Education Department Bihar, Patna.

3. Director Primary Education Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

5. District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Sitamarhi.

6. District Education Officer, Sitamarhi.

7. Block Education Officer, Sitamarhi.

8. panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Niyojan Samiti, Gram panchayt Raj Banaul, Bokhara, District- Sitamarhi.

9. Ram Babu Prasad, son of late Ram Chandra Sah Village + P.O. - Banaul, P.S.- Nanpur, Block- Bokhara, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girjanand Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC3-Syed Arshad Alam Mr Mahtab Alam, AC to SC 3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-07-2015 Bereft of all controversies and the exchange of pleadings, one legal question pressed into service by the counsel for the petitioner on the question of suspension of the petitioner merits consideration. Attention of the Court has been drawn to Rule 15 (Cha) of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers Employment and Service Conditions (Amendment Rules), 2014. In view of the same, Annexure- 20, dated 26.12.2014 is quashed. Suspension of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.854 of 2015 dt.08-07-2015 2/2 petitioner stands revoked but the petitioner is directed to hand over charge forthwith and if he fails to cooperate, the respondent authority can act in accordance with law and the rules. The controversy is allowed to rest in terms of the above direction. Writ stands disposed of.

The personal appearance of the District Programme Officer and the Panchayat Secretary stands dispensed with. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U