Sudhir Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.765 of 2014 ====================================================== Sudhir Prasad Singh Son of Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla Sarvoday Nagar, P.S. - Town, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Principle Secretary, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna.

3. Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. Inspector General of Police, Department of Vigilance Bihar, Patna.

5. Inspector General of Police, Economic Offence Department, Bihar, Patna.

6. Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Transport Building, Patna.

7. Regional Transport Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger.

8. Regional Transport Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

9. Divisional Commissioner, Munger.

10. District Magistrate, Begusarai.

11. Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.

12. District Magistrate, Samastipur.

13. District Transport Officer, Begusarai.

14. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.

15. Office-in-Charge, Begusarai Police Station.

16. Proprietor of Nayya Rath Motor Service Head Office. Bus stand, Begusarai.

17. Ramashish Sahoo, Clerk Regional Transport Office, Munger. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned SC-8 for the State.

The present application has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to get the allegations made by him enquired by the Vigilance.

However, after some argument, learned

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.765 of 2014 (5) dt.16-07-2015 2/2 counsel submits that he had already filed a police case being Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 364 of 2014, against the accused who are also private respondents in the present application but due to the connivance of the local police, final form has been submitted against the accused. He submits that in view of the same, he may be permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to file a protest petition in the other case before the Court where the police has submitted final form which has not yet been accepted.

In view of the aforesaid, the application stands disposed off with the liberty aforesaid. It is expected that if the petitioner files such protest petition, the Court concerned shall, upon hearing the parities, pass appropriate orders.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T