Brahamdeo Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30063 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2017 Thana -MURLIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Brahamdeo Rishideo son fo Rampukar, Rishideo, resident of village - Pokhram, Ward No.7, P.S. Murliganj, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Murliganj P.S.Case No.101 of 2017, for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that while committing theft, 'hulla' was raised and thereafter, the petitioner was arrested on chase along with the other accused persons and one loaded country-made pistol and some cartridges were also recovered.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and no stolen articles have been recovered. The petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody for more than three months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30063 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that he was arrested just after the occurrence, as such I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, , however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of four months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail bond before the court concerned.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U