Dr. Krishna Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8061 of 2014 ====================================================== Dr. Krishna Kumar Singh son of Late Bindeshwari Prasad Singh by resident of Village : - Tarawa Magarpal, P.S. - Dariyapur, District - Saran at Chapra, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary, Backward Class and Most Backward Class Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Under Secretary, Backward Class and Most Backward Class Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Deputy Director, (Head), Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7. The District Welfare Officer, Patna.

8. The Principal, +2 Backward Class and Most Backward Class Girls Residential High School, Kadamkuan, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Ban Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nadeem Seraj, GP20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already complied the impugned order of transfer by reporting before the Secretary of the Department, this Court will not find any reason now to go into its correctness specially when it is also an admitted position that the post held by him is a transferable post and the petitioner, having continued at Patna for more than three years,

Patna High Court CWJC No.8061 of 2014 (2) dt.14-07-2015 had even otherwise become liable for being transferred. In that view of the matter, this Court will also not be impressed with the stand taken by the petitioner in the writ application that there was no arrangement made for the subject, in question, in the school at Patna. It is not the concern of the petitioner to see as to whether any arrangement was made in Patna or not. The moment the petitioner was given an order of transfer, he had to move to the transferred place of posting and that ultimately has been done by him of-course during pendency of the writ application.

That being so, this application on account of joining of the petitioner by way of compliance of impugned order of transfer has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U