Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30270 of 2017 (3) dt.10-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30270 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2015 Thana -MADHUBAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh S/o Radhakant Singh, Resident of Village - Dubhan, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2017 in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 7 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 225, 353, 332, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and for the same occurrence, two separate cases have been instituted namely the present one as well as Madhuban P.S. Case No. 6 of 2015, and the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail in the latter case. He is also on bail in all the other seven prior cases in which he has been made accused.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 7 of 2015, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30270 of 2017 (3) dt.10-08-2017 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T