Mahadeo Bind @ Mahabir Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45710 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2024 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== Mahadeo Bind @ Mahabir Bind S/o Late Ramphal Bind R/o Vill- Kurua, P.S.- Oakri, Distt- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 1317 of 2024 arising out of Maner P.S. Case No. 286 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner murdered the informant's father due to previous dispute.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is being dragged in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. There is no eye-witness to the occurrence. It has been submitted on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45710 of 2025(4) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 06.05.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that petitioner has himself confessed his guilt and disclosed the manner in which he committed the murder of the deceased which aligns with the post-mortem report and therefore, the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also there being ample material against the petitioner in the case diary, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

9. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew the prayer for grant of bail before the Trial Court if the trial is not concluded within a period of five months from today. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T