Munna Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34167 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2015 Thana -DINARA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Munna Sah .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-08-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that under an agreement the during the agriculture year 2013-14,petitioner being the rice miller was supplied 4000 quintals of paddy by the Rohtas unit of The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., in lieu thereof the petitioner was supposed to supply 2680 quintals of custom milled rice and he supplied only 1080 quintals of custom milled rice but failed to supply 1600 quintals of processed rice worth `3965696/-.
It is submitted that processed rice could not be supplied due to laches on the part of the authorities of Bihar State
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34167 of 2015 (2) dt.17-08-2015 2/3 Food Corporation Ltd. and under the agreement there is provision of recovery of alleged amount by initiating certificate proceeding, and the certificate proceeding has already been initiated. The petitioner is still ready to supply the balance processed rice. It is submitted by Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. that the petitioner failed to supply the processed rice within stipulated period i.e. 31.12.2014 and under the agreement, the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation is entitled to initiate legal action for recovery of due amount. The petitioner undertakes to deposit of 20% of alleged due amount within a period of five months through bank draft in favour of The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Ltd., Patna, though, statement to that effect has not been made in the petition.
Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 125
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34167 of 2015 (2) dt.17-08-2015 3/3 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below on submission of bank draft of 20% of alleged due amount of `3965696/- within a period of five months.
The above deposit will be subject to the certificate proceeding but the same will not be treated as an admission of the petitioner against the claim of the informant. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U T