Anjan Kumar Sukala @ Anjan Sukala @ Munna Scorpio v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24956 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2014 Thana -LALGANJ District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Anjan Kumar Sukala @ Anjan Sukala @ Munna Scorpio Son of Late Nawal Kishore Sukala, Resident of Village- Agarpur Nunu Babu Chowk, P.S. Lalganj, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manish Kumar 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 24-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.01.2017 in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the driver of the Bolero car, is that some unknown criminal intercepted and took away the Bolero car on pistol point.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the First Information Report and his name surfaced on the confessional statement of coaccused, Ashish Ranjan Kumar. It has further been submitted that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24956 of 2017 (4) dt.24-07-2017 2/3 no Test Identification Parade has been done so far and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his conscious possession and just because he is made accused in 11 cases, some of them being of similar nature, that he has been made accused and remanded in the present case. He submits that charge sheet has already been submitted and he undertakes to cooperate with the trial.
However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the petitioner is a habitual offender and a number of cases are pending against him for road robbery.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2014, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned P.S./ Court, who would file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner and that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24956 of 2017 (4) dt.24-07-2017 3/3 petitioner will appear before the learned Court below on each and every date and failure to appear before the learned Court below on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.
It is further made clear that if, in future, petitioner indulges in similar nature of offence, the prosecution will be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/- U T