Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44893/2018bail granted

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44893 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2018 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Sunil Kumar S/o Janardan Prasad, R/o Vill.- Padsar, P.S.- Karakat in the District of Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 34 of 2018 (arising out of Karakat P. S. Case No. 112 of 2018), registered for offences punishable under Sections 354 (B) of Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, who is a teacher in the Coaching Institute, is misbehaving with the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has falsely been implicated and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.06.2018. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44893 of 2018 (3) dt.06-09-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with POCSO Case No. 34 of 2018 ( arising out of Karakat P.S.Case No. 112 of 2018), subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T