Buchiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47750 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -258 Year- 2016 Thana -KAHALGAON District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Buchiya Devi, Wife of Kallar Mandal, resident of Village- Sant Nagar Fulkiya, P.S.- Ghogha, Dist.- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deep Nishi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kahalgaon (Ghogha) P.S.Case No.258 of 2016 dated 5.8.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is said to be mother-in-law and the case is of dowry death.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and nothing has been attributed against her. She is in custody since 28.11.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47750 of 2018 (3) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Bhagalpur in connection with Kahalgaon (Ghogha) P.S.Case No.258 of 2016.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T