Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26513/2017bail granted

Kamlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26513 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictMADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Kamlesh Kumar Son of Late Surendra Kisku @ Surendra Kishku, Resident of Village- Kothi Tola, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Bihariganj, DistrictMadhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 11.03.2017 in connection with Complaint Case No. C-21(17) of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 4 litres of illicit chulai wine. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, there is allegation of recovery of only 4 litres of chulai wine, for which petitioner has sufficiently been punished as he has remained in judicial custody for more than three months and has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26513 of 2017 (3) dt.22-06-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, quantity of liquor recovered and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for more than three months, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Udakishunganj, District - Madhepura, in connection with Complaint Case No. C21(17) of 2017. It is made clear if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T