Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37619/2020dismissed

Ajit Kumar @ Banshi Lal v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-03Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 37619 of 2020 Arising Out of PS Case No.-583 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ajit Kumar @ Banshi Lal, aged about 20 years (Male) Son of Ram Prasad Rai, Resident of Village- Dighi Kala East, PS- Hajipur Sadar, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 03-03-2021 The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Arif, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP) for the State.

3. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Hajipur Sadar PS Case No. 583 of 2019 dated 03.09.2019, instituted under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The petitioner, is alleged to be party to looting of the van along with articles, of the informant.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the van and articles has not been recovered from his possession and it was in front of the door of his maternal grandfather, who has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37619 of 2020 dt.03-03-2021 2/2 named him due to mala fide intention as he was asking for share in the property. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 12.06.2020, having no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP submitted that there is no occasion for a grandfather to implicate his grandson and the vehicle having been found in front of the door of the grandfather of the petitioner and the grandfather has disclosed that it was the petitioner who had brought the vehicle.

7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

9. However, the Court below shall expedite the trial. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T