Ranjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26818 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -309 Year- 2016 Thana -BAKHTIYARPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ranjay Singh, S/o Kameshwar Singh @ Kancho Singh, R/o VillageRawaich, P.S. Bakhiarpur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Special Case No.102 of 2016 arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S.Case No.309 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 20/22 of N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 300 gram of Ganja from the possession of the petitioner. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and though he is accused in three other cases also but he is on bail in those cases that is not of similar type of cases and in this case, he is in custody for about seven months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26818 of 2017 (2) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and also considering small quantity of Ganja, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on condition that allegation of recovery of 300 gram of Ganja will be verified by the learned trial court and if it is found true, the learned court below shall release the petitioner on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge X, Patna in connection with Special Case No.102 of 2016 arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S.Case No.309 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T