Rajbali Pandey v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.596 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1799 of 2024 ====================================================== Rajbali Pandey Son of Late Ramprasad Pandey Resident of VillageLaxmipur, P.O.- Laxmipur, P.S.- Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar- 813222. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110001. 2.
The Secretary, Road Transport and Highways, Government of India. 3.
The National Highway Authority of India through its Chairman, G-5 and G6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075. 4.
The Chairman, National Highway Authority of India, G-5 and G-6, Sector10, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075. 5.
The General Manager, The National Highway Authority of India, Regional Office, Bihar, S.K. Puri, Patna-800001 6.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
7.
The Commissioner-cum-Learned Arbitrator, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur. 8.
The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.
9.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Kumar Kaushik, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. S. Raja, AAG -5 For NHAI :
Mr. Sriram Krishna, Adv.
For UOI :
Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with a view to file a petition for review of the order dated 14.5.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge
Patna High Court L.P.A No.596 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 in CWJC No. 1799 of 2024.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
5. It is clarified that we have not examined the case of the appellant on merits.
(Vipul M. Pancholi, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) sunilkumar/- U