Ram Tabkya Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2739 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- JEHANABAD ===========================================================
1. Ram Tabkya Yadav Son of Late Ram Bhajju Yadav @ Late Ram Bhajan Singh Resident of Village - Hasanpur, P.S. + District - Arwal. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Usha Kumari No.1, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 03.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad, in connection with Arwal SC/ST Police Station Case No.10 of 2018, registered under Sections 341/323/307/354/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(F)/3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Allegation against the appellant is of commission of injury with Tangi, a sharp cutting weapon, at the head of the son of the informant Santosh Paswan. The doctor has found lacerated wound
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2739 of 2018 dt.27-08-2018 P2/ caused by hard and blunt substance.
Submission is that there is case and counter case. The appellant is in custody since 20.05.2018. The appellant has got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date29.08.2018 Transmission Date 29.08.2018