Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1426/2021dismissed

Chandradev Sahani @ Chandardev Sahni @ Chandev Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-25Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1426 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-467 Year-2018 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== CHANDRADEV SAHANI @ CHANDARDEV SAHNI @ CHANDEV SAHNI S/o Chandrika Sahani R/o Village-Jagdishpur Mallahi, P.S.- Nautan ( Jagdishpur), District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. J.K.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 12.09.2018, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Nautan (Jagdishpur) P.S. Case No. 467 of 2018, having earlier been rejected by order dated 11.12.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 69634 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner reiterates his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1426 of 2021(2) dt.25-01-2021 2/2 submission that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely because he happens to be husband of the deceased. It is submitted that as a matter of fact the deceased had committed suicide. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State, this Court is not inclined to take a different view in the matter from its earlier order dated 11.12.2019 aforesaid. The petition stands dismissed.

5. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T