Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42838/2024bail granted

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Chinies v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-26Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42838 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2024 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR @ ROHIT KUMAR CHINIES SON OF SHAILENDRA SINGH VILLAGE- CHAURHI, P.S.- HALSI, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 99 of 2024 dated 16.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants stopped the pick-up van of the informant after putting a barrier on the gun point and snatched the Aadhar Card, License and Rs. 10,000/- and also snatched Rs. 21,000/- from the owner of the Gram. They further damaged the pick-up van of the informant with bricks and stones and fled away from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42838 of 2024(2) dt.26-06-2024 2/2 case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Akhilesh Kumar and Suraj Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 99 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T