Jainudin Ansari @ Jainuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48937 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -296 Year- 2015 Thana -RAMGARH District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Jainudin Ansari @ Jainuddin Ansari, Son of Suleman Darjee, Resident of Village: Baraura, P.S: Ramgarh, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharmesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected by order dated 18.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 10469 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail after remaining further six months in custody and, as such, now the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration, as the petitioner has not repeated the blow and no offence under section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out. The learned APP fairly submits that the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail after remaining further six months in custody as per observation passed in order dated 18.04.2016. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48937 of 2016 (2) dt.16-11-2016 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in connection with S.Tr. No.112 of 2016, arising out of Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 296 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T