Savitri Devi @ Rampari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39487 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2018 Thana- BAKHTIARPUR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

SAVITRI DEVI @ RAMPARI DEVI, Wife of Yogendra Ram, Resident of Village-Ghoghasam Ward No.2, P.S.-Bakhtiyarpur (Kanariya O.P.), DistrictSaharsa. 2.

Neetu Kumari @ Nexlight ,Daughter of Yogendra Ram, Resident of VillageGhoghasam Ward No.2, P.S.-Bakhtiyarpur (Kanariya O.P.), District-Saharsa. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhim Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Bakhtiarpur (Kanariya O.P.) P.S. Case No. 352 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 373 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the accused persons, including the petitioners is of kidnapping of the daughter of the informant for forcing her for prostitution.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and as a matter of fact the daughter of the complainant/informant herself fled away and they have been made accused in this case. It is also submitted that petitioner No.2 is aged 18 years.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39487 of 2019(2) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail stating that impugned order shows that allegation was found true by the superior also and the case is under investigation at present and the girl is still traceless. In view of above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. They may surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T