Ram Mohan Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42625 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Ram Mohan Das Son of Ramlakhan Singh Resident ofVillage-Bhatauliya, P.S.-Dumara, Distt.-Sitamarhi, wrongly address mentioned in FIR as Resident of Village-Bhagwanpur Bibiganj Sthit Fakira Tower A Block,Flat No. 209, P.S.- Sadar, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhubala Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in a case instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(d), 30(e), 56 of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

3. As per the allegations made in the F.I.R., various incriminating articles purportedly used for the manufacturing and packaging of illicit liquor were recovered from the rented shop of the petitioner. It is further alleged that the petitioner was alleged to have fled

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42625 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/3 from the place of seizure.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that no offence under any provision of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act will be attracted in this case as there is no any Indian Made Foreign liquor in the name and style of Black Hyena all over India. Petitioner has no concern either with the place of seizure or with the recovered incriminating articles.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42625 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 3/3 event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Sadar P.S. Case no. 316 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise I, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Nirajkrs/- U T