Patna High CourtCR. WJC/778/2015dismissed

Indra Kishrore Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Home Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna And

2016-02-11Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.778 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- SHEOHAR =========================================================== Indra Kishrore Chaudhary S/o Kapileshwar Chaudhary resident of Village -Velwa, P.S Piprahi, District- Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna .

2. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Sheohar.

8. Officer-in-charge, Patahi, East Champaran.

9. Officer-in-charge, Sheohar.

10. Ramesh Nandani Sharma S/o late Maruti Nandan Sharma resident of VillagePatahi, P.S. Patahi, District East Champaran. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh, G.P.-31 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-02-2016 By way of the present application preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the first information report (for short "the FIR")

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.778 of 2015 dt.11-02-2016 2/2 of Sheohar P. S. Case No. 74 of 2014 dated 18.04.2014 registered under Sections 420, 468, 470 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. 2.

I have perused the FIR as contained in Annexure-3 to this application. The allegations made in the FIR do attract the ingredients of a cognizable offence. 3.

In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T