Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51110/2016bail granted

Om Prakash @ Gabbar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51110 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Om Prakash @ Gabbar.

2. Rohit @ Rocky, Both sons of Sri Arun Sah, resident of MohallaRambhadra, PS.- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 341, 324, 326, 386, 307, 452, 504, 120B and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioners is that they fired shot upon informant's uncle with an intention to kill him. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioners that earlier prayer for bail of petitioners was rejected vide Annexure-1 to the present application. It has been pointed out that wrong submission was made by learned counsel for informant where it was alleged that the injured person subsequently had died. In fact, the injured is still alive and the case is for the offence under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 16.5.2016. Chargesheet has been submitted against petitioners. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses against petitioners. General and omnibus allegation has been made against petitioners and others. No specific injury has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51110 of 2016 (2) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 attributed against them.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case no. 87 of 2016.

(Sudhir Singh, J) sudip/- U T