Narendra Kumar Verma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12847 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Narendra Kumar Verma, son of late Brihaspati Mahto, rersident of Village Nosra, P.S. Noorsari, Dist. Nalanda.

2. Nand Lal Prasad, Son of late Ram Lakhan Prasad of Village Sikri Par, P.S. Wen, Dist. Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Nalanda.

5. The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

6. The District Programme Officer, Nalanda.

7. The Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Nalanda.

8. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.K. Jha- AAG14 For the Staff Commission : Mr. K.K. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. C.B. Das, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the validity of the degree obtained by the petitioners from Rashtriya Patrachar Sansthan, Kanpur already admitted by the petitioner, in all possible ramifications, in the order of this Court dated 19.12.2013 in CWJC No. 21805 of 2012, this Court now will not allow the petitioners to have a second innings, inasmuch as, the detailed judgment, running into 12 pages, has settled each and every issue. The liberty given to the petitioners to approach the authorities on the basis of documents

Patna High Court CWJC No.12847 of 2015 (2) dt.20-08-2015 of Higher Education Section of the State of Uttar Pradesh dated 6.9.2000 has also been dealt by the Principal Secretary of the Education Department in the impugned order in absolutely correct manner wherein he has found that the last document dated 6.9.2000 was actually not even brought on record. That being so, this Court would also not find any error in the impugned order dated 20.3.2015 which only states that the decree of the petitioners obtained from Rashtria Patrachar Sansthan, Kanpur was never fulfilling the requirement of the 2010 Rules and the advertisement, which was issued by the respondent State of Bihar for filling up 34540 posts.

Thus, this writ application also must fail and is hereby dismissed.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U