Jagdeo Sada And ORS v. Ganeshi Sada And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SECOND APPEAL No.359 of 2009 ======================================================
1. JAGDEO SADA, son of Late Panchu Mushar
2. Parmeshwari Sada, son of Jagdeo Sada
3. Janeshwari Sada, son of Jagdeo Sada
4. Gopal Sada, son of Jagdeo Sada
5. Chandra Kishore Sada, son of Jagdeo Sada
6. Chamai Kumari
7. Shanti Kumari, Both daughters of Late Chandeshwari Sada, All residents of village HansariP.S.- Simri Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa. ... Plaintiffs ...... Appellants ........ Appellant/s
Versus
1. Ganeshi Sada, son of late Kaleshwar Sada
2. Shital Sada, son of late Kaleshwar Sada
3. Mangal Sada, son of late Kashi Sada
4. Sarjan Sada, son of Late Adhik Sada
5. Bido Sada, son of Late Adhik Sada
6. Banarsi Sada, son of Baldeo Sada
7. Lalo Sada, son of Baldo Sada
8. Nago Sada, son of Late Ishar Sada
9. Bucho Sada, son of late Ishar Sada
10. Rajo Sada, son of Late Ishar Sada
11. Bajo Sada, son of Late Ishar Sada
12. Gultan Sada, son of Mogal Sada
13. Pappu Sada, son of Late Giro Sada
14. Poplesh Sada, son of Late Giro Sada
15. Rajesh Sada, son of Late Giro Sada
16. Raghunandan Sada, son of Late Giro Sada
17. Janak Sada, son of Late Madhukar Sada
18. Suresh Sada, son of Late Dhanik Sada
19. Janeshwari Sada, son of Late Jajeshwar Sada 20 Most. Sehabi Devi, wife of Late Jageshwar Sada
21. Manoj Sada, son of Late Satyanarayan Sada
22. Thengahu Sada, son of Late Gena Sada All resident of village Hansari, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiarpur, District- Saharsa. .... Respondents ....... Defendants ............ Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Najmul Hoda For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 Vide Office notes dated 20.1.2020, the office has pointed out that due to non-compliance of order dated 19.11.2019, the present appeal stood dismissed for default on
Patna High Court SA No.359 of 2009(10) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 4.1.2020.
Consequently, the instant appeal stands dismissed as whole.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U