Shambhu Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11473 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Shambhu Rai, Son of Late Ramdeo Rai, resident of Village - Birpur, Police Station - Sursand, District - Sitamarhi.
2. Radha Krishna Deities, installed in the Math known as Birpur Math through the worshiper Shambhu Rai (Petitioner No. 1) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Collector, Sitamarhi.
3. Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.
4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Pupri, Sitamarhi.
5. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sitamarhi.
6. Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Patna through its Adhyaksh.
7. Krishna Devi Wife of Mukhdeo Rai
8. Mukhdeo Rai, Son of Bechan Rai deed
9. Sindhu Rai
10. Harishankar Prasad, Both sons of Mukhdeo Rai, All residents of Village - Birpur, Police Station - Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Kant Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 30-03-2017 We are informed by the counsel representing Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts that the Administrator of the Trust is ceased of the matter, he has already fixed the case for consideration on 13.04.2017.
That being the position, at this stage, no indulgence by this Court in the Public Interest Litigation is called for. Petitioner may
Patna High Court CWJC No.11473 of 2015 dt.30-03-2017 2/2 approach the Administrator who is ceased of the matter and ventilate his grievance before the said authority and the said authority shall proceed to take action in accordance to the statutory provisions. The statutory authority is expected to take action in accordance with law after hearing all concerned, preferably within a period of six months. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) P.K.P.
AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 04.04.2017 Transmission Date