Deomuna Ram @ Deomunna Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27473 of 2017 (4) dt.18-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27473 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2016 Thana -AKHODHIGOLA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Deomuna Ram @ Deomunna Ram, S/o Dina Ram, resident of VillageBandhpa, P.S.- Akorhi Gola, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of taking away the tempo as well as some cash of the informant on the point of pistol. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and uptil now no Test Identification Parade has been conducted and he has been in judicial custody since 09.12.2016 and so far other criminal antecedents are concerned, he has been remanded in all those cases after arrest in the present case.

Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the above facts.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27473 of 2017 (4) dt.18-09-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Dehri, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T