Rekha Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41927 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2013 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== REKHA DEVI W/o Navin Mahto R/o village- Parora, P.S.- K.Hat, DistrictPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case no. 498 of 2013 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 353, 447, 384, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, the informant got information that 100 to 150 unknown persons with deadly weapons captured 18.79 Acres land forcefully after that the informant with other police officials went there and tried to vacate them from land. It is further alleged that the petitioner was leading the mob and created hindrance in their official
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41927 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/3 duty.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. It is further submitted that one Kumar Navbharat has purchased land just adjacent to the land of co-accused who is husband of this petitioner and the informant of K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 497 of 2013 was doing construction by adding part of land of co-accused due to which this petitioner has falsely been made accused in this case and this fact is mentioned in para 11 of the petition. The allegation of leading the mob against the petitioner is false and fabricated.
Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case no. 498 of 2013, she will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41927 of 2022(2) dt.07-12-2022 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Purnea subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T