Praveen Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44670 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -215 Year- 2014 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Praveen Yadav son of Tejo Yadav @ Tej Narayan Yadav resident of village Matihani, P.S. Mansi, District Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No. 215 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of firing shot on the informant, causing injury on the right hand. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and there is no eye witness to the occurrence. It is also submitted that both the parties have compromised and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 19.06.2018.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44670 of 2018 (3) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No. 215 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T