Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44735/2018disposal with observation

Aaishwarya Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-05Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44735 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2018 Thana -RAJIVNAGAR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Aaishwarya Kumar son of Alok Kumar resident of Village : Lala Bhadsara, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District : Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar - 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 105 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 409, 114/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., petitioner is Door Step Bank Officer and allegation is of misappropriation of Rs.3,00,910/- and lodging a false case that the amount was snatched.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed no offence and he has been robbed by unknown criminals, for which he lodged a case bearing as Rajeev Nagar P. S. Case No. 103 of 2018 and one colleague of the petitioner, Ravi Kumar was deposited the amount in the Main

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44735 of 2018 (3) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 Branch of Bandhan Bank, situated at Ashiana - Digha Road and except the confessional statement of co-accused Ravi Kumar, there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2018. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who opposes the prayer for bail.

Having hear both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as such, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, it is made clear that the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T