Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44736/2018bail granted

Kamlesh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-27Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44736 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2018 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Kamlesh Thakur, Son of Late Bhola Thakur, Resident of Village-Baheri, P.S.- Baheri, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhu Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in G.O. Case No. 600 of 2018 arising out of Baheri P.S. Case No. 135 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 351 Litre of foreign liquor from his newly constructed house. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 01.07.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44736 of 2018(4) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 Judge-IV cum Special Judge, Darbhanga, in connection with G.O. Case No. 600 of 2018 arising out of Baheri P.S. Case No. 135 of 2018 , with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U