← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44295/2025allowed

Raj Kumar Turha v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-04Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44295 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2024 Thana- Sinha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar Turha Son of Hira lal Turha @ Hira Lal Ram Resident of VillageMarha Lewad, Police Station Sinha, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the daughter of the informant was married to the petitioner. The petitioner and his wife were having dispute on small issues. It was informed on 27.04.2024 that some occurrence has taken place with the daughter of the informant. When the informant went there, he found that his daughter was lying dead on a coat and the family members have fled away. Admittedly, the petitioner is the husband.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44295 of 2025(2) dt.04-07-2025 2/3 that in this case, the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 06.02.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 84718 of 2024 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of year of custody. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner has completed more than a year of custody and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.05.2024. He has further submitted that in this case, charges have been framed.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submits that in the statement of the informant, it has come that there was demand of bike due to which the deceased was subjected to cruelty. The doctor has found ligature mark and bruise of different sizes on the person of deceased.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sinha P.S. Case No. 20 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara with the condition that the petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44295 of 2025(2) dt.04-07-2025 3/3 cooperate in trial and will be present in the Court whenever required.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T