← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53143/2016bail granted

Uday Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53143 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2016 Thana -KHANPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Uday Kumar, S/o Vishwanath Sahay, Resident of Village- Shahpur, P.S. Khanpur, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 364, 365, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution story in brief, is that the co-accused namely Prashant Kumar and Suryans Kumar have kidnapped the daughter of Ganga Prasad on the point of pistol and kept her in a house, where the petitioner being father of co-accused Prashant Kumar was watching her. It is further alleged that from the possession of co-accused Prashant Kumar, one pistol loaded with four cartridges along with five cartridges and one Khokha have also been recovered from his pant. From possession of co-accused

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53143 of 2016 (2) dt.08-12-2016 2/2 namely Suryans Kumar 14 cartridges are said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22.09.2016. The charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The victim has been examined under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. She has not named the petitioner. The specific allegation has been made against the other co-accused persons namely Prashant Kumar and Suryans Kumar. On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III, Samastipur in connection with Khanpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2016. (Sudhir Singh, J.) Amit/- U T