Amlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39332 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2026 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Amlesh Yadav S/o Amarajit Yadav At present R/o Manoharpur, District- West Singhbhum, P.S. and P.O.- Manoharpur, State Jharkhand, Pin - 833104 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anurag Supreme, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Vijayepur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026 dated 16.03.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 317(3), 336, 338, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 15.03.2026, during vehicle checking, the police intercepted a Scorpio Classic whose driver failed to produce the registration certificate. On enquiry, the driver disclosed that the vehicle had been provided by Guddu Yadav. Thereafter, Guddu Yadav was arrested, and on the basis of his confession, the petitioner, Amlesh Kumar Yadav, was implicated in the case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39332 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Guddu Yadav while nothing incriminating has been recovered from the constructive possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and is studying at Jharkhand and preparing for various competitive examinations.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is nothing specific against the petitioner and has name has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused and, as also, the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Goplaganj in connection with Vijayepur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, subject to the condition as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39332 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T