Govind Sahni @ Surendra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27692 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2015 Thana -BALIGAON District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Govind Sahni @ Surendra Sahni, Son of Ram Vilash Sahni @ Bilash Sahni, Resident of Village- Harlochanpur Sukki, P.S. Patepur, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baligawn P.S. Case No. 38 of 2015, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 427, 387 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, the name of the petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Pramod Paswan. Further submission is that, in fact, the petitioner is accused in five cases out of which he has released on bail in four cases, as detailed in para-03 of the petition, due to that reasons, the Police managed to implicate the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27692 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 petitioner in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Pramod Paswan. The petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2017.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Baligawn P.S. Case No. 38 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T