Bablu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37523 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2020 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Bablu Sah S/o Late Rajendra Sah Resident of Village-Dhamna, Police Station-Jhajha, District-Jamui.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Amit Kashyap, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 16-03-2021 Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case no. 166 of 2020 registered under sections 341, 323, 354 A, 326, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the F.I.R., the two named accused persons including the petitioner herein are stated to have thrown hot oil on the face of the daughter of the informant causing serious injuries.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that from perusal of the FIR itself it would evident that the parties are Gotiyas and it was over a minor dispute that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37523 of 2020(4) dt.16-03-2021 2/2 the occurrence is stated to have taken place. It is further submitted that there was no intention of causing injury to the daughter of the informant. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 13.06.2020 i.e. for more than nine months.

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the contents of the injury report of the daughter of the informant wherein the injury no. 1 has been found to be grievous in nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The application is rejected. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Partha Sarthy, J) shahzad/- U T