← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39258/2025dismissed

Suraj Chauhan @ Suraj Kumar @ Gaddu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-15Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39258 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2025 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Suraj Chauhan @ Suraj Kumar @ Gaddu S/O Randhir Chauhan R/o -Kharighat, PS- Hasanganj, Distt- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP For the informant :

Mr. Bhola prasad, Advocate Mr. Indrajeet Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Katihar Nagar (S) P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of killing the deceased with an air gun.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2025.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39258 of 2025(4) dt.15-09-2025 2/2

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as the learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that the petitioner had shot at the husband of the informant due to which he died.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T