Suresh Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31737 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2017 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Suresh Yadav, son of Late Rajendra Yadav, resident of Village- Siswa, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Union of India through Inspector General, S.S.B., Frontier Head Quarter, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raxaul P.S.Case No.78 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 09 ltrs. of nepali liquor. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has remained in custody for more than three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31737 of 2017 (2) dt.14-07-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Raxaul, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Raxaul P.S.Case No.78 of 2017 . With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U