Neetu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15758 of 2021 ====================================================== Neetu Kumari Wife of Sri Mohanji Bhagat Resident of Village and P.O. Kapasia Ward No. 7, P.S. - Arer, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Deputy Director, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

5.

The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

6.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Benipatti, Madhubani. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Benipatti, Madhubani. 8.

Smt. Sanju Kumari Wife of Shri Nagendra Mishra Resident of Village and P.O. Kapasia, P.S. Arer, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Gandeo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Udeshya Kr. Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raisul Haque ( SC-10 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) for directing the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner for selection on the post of Anganbari Sevika as per advertisement in Anganbari Centre No. 379 situated

Patna High Court CWJC No.15758 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2024 2/2 at Ward no.7 in Kapasia Panchayat on the basis of merit list in which petitioner is at Sl. no. 3 belongs to O.B.C. and others who are at Sl. No.

1 and 2 are in general categories and to grant any other consequential benefits for which petitioner may found entitled in accordance with law."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U