Vikash @ Biru Sah @ Biru v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23207 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2016 Thana -DINARA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. VIKASH @ BIRU SAH @ BIRU Son of Uday Sah, Resident of VillageSemari , P.s.- Dawath , District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Prasad Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 411 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 225/2016. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. It appears that his named transpired during course of investigation. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade and so far other cases are concerned, in those cases the petitioner is named only on the basis of suspicion. Further the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23207 of 2017 (4) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 petitioner has remained in custody for more than six months. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 225/2016, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U