Md. Inamul @ Md. Munna v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43524 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2024 Thana- MALAYPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Md. Inamul @ Md. Munna S/O Md. Najam R/O Village-Satgama,P.S.- Jamui,Distt-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown persons for missing of brother of the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that F.I.R. is against unknown persons during course of investigation, only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner on account of the fact that one month prior to the alleged occurrence, this petitioner, along with other accused persons, had gone to house of informant and forcibly tried to take away the toto and upon protest, this petitioner told the informant that his brother has dashed his wife with the toto
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43524 of 2024(3) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 and thus asked a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards treatment and threatened that otherwise, he would take away the toto. Except this, there is no material on record to show that this petitioner committed the alleged offence. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Malaypur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T