Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39750/2026bail rejected

Karan Kumar @ Karn Mod v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-29Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39750 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2026 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Karan Kumar @ Karn Mod S/o Khudhi Rai Resident of Mohalla- Bhaisani Tola, PS Malsalami, District- Patna 2.

Kundan Kumar S/o Ashok Ray @ Ashok Kumar Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Bhaisani Tola, PS Malsalami, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the pre-arrest bail petition of petitioner no. 1.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. This bail petition with respect to petitioner no. 1 is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no. 2 and the State .

5. Petitioner no. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(B) IIB of NDPS Act and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 112(2) and 318(4) of the BNS and 11 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39750 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 Bengal Gambling Act.

6. As per prosecution case , total 1.610 Kg of Ganja and 154 liters of illicit liquor was recovered from the spot.

7. It is submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of petitioner transpired during investigation. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

8. Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner has got 9 criminal antecedents most of them are of similar nature.

9. Considering the huge quantity of recovery and also the fact that petitioner has got 9 criminal antecedents, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/SanjayU T