Bechan Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39445 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Bechan Sahni S/O Amiri Sahni R/o Village- Mangaiya dharampur, ward no 10, Babhangama, PS- Siwaipatti, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 504/2025 dated 10.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 103(1) read with section 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner and the co-accused persons is of committing murder of the informant's brother by throttling.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is the in-laws relative of the deceased.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39445 of 2025(4) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. It is further submitted that all the witnesses in the case diary have supported the prosecution case. As per the postmortem report, the cause of death is Asphyxia.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the application stands rejected.
7. The learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T