← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53868/2016bail granted

Binod Manjhi @ Binod v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53868 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -138 Year- 2016 Thana -BELAGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Binod Manjhi @ Binod, son of Late Fonu Manjhi, Resident of VillageHujrapar, P.S. Ghosi, District Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 138 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 386, 435, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 38 and 40 of the UAP Act and Section 17 of the CLA Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that some accused persons including the petitioner came with various weapons and stopped the construction work and confined informant. It is also alleged that they were set a blaze several machines and vehicles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no substantive evidence against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53868 of 2016 (2) dt.15-12-2016 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and similarly, situated co accused persons of this case have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 4.10.2016, passed in Cri. Misc. No. 42455 of 2015 and order dated 22.10.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 34215 of 2016. The petitioner is incarcerating in jail custody since 19.05.2016, having no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya, in Belaganj P.S. Case No. 138 of 2016.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) siddharth/- U T