Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32608/2017dismissed

Monu Singh @ Manu Singh @ Abhimanu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32608 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -201 Year- 2016 Thana -DIGHWARA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Monu Singh @ Manu Singh @ Abhimanu Singh, son of Dilip Singh, resident of Village- Ajad Nagar, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, DistrictSaran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindhyacal Singh Mr. Ram Binod Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Reena Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-08-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Dighwara P.S.Case No.201 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 379, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of firing causing death of the deceased.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that from perusal of the case diary, it appears that the informant is eye witness of the occurrence and the persons travelling with the deceased has been examined on the 4th day and they have also disclosed the name of the petitioner but the falsity of the case will appear from the fact that the statement of the persons present at

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32608 of 2017 (3) dt.01-08-2017 2/2 the place of occurrence has not been recorded by the police at that time.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the witnesses have also supported the case of the prosecution and there is direct allegation against the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T