Abhinandan Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54072 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2016 Thana -JANKINAGAR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Abhinandan Yadav

2. Ganesh Yadav, both are sons of Late Nemani Yadav, resident of Rampur Tilak, Gariyari Tola, Ward No. 5, P.S. Jankinagar, District Purnia .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagdish Prasad Bhagat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 68 of 2016 registered under sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the I.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have been implicated in this case due to enmity and grudge with ulterior motive. There is no chain to connect the circumstantial evidence.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner with submission that during investigation involvement of petitioners has been found in the brutal murder of the deceased and they have been charge sheeted.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54072 of 2016 (4) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Manish/- U T