Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31461 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -170 Year- 2017 Thana -RAMNAGAR DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kumar Sah Son of Shesh Nath Sah, Resident of Village- Kailash Nagar, Bagaha, Police Station- Bagaha, District- West Champaran(Bettiah).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ramnagar P.S.Case No.170 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of trying to commit theft in the house of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is a case of only attempt and further the petitioner is in custody for about two months. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31461 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran (Bettiah) in connection with Ramnagar P.S.Case No.170 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T