Munna Chaudhary @ Munna Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38660 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2018 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== MUNNA CHAUDHARY @ MUNNA KUMAR CHAUDHARY Son of Sohan Chaudhary, Resident of Village-Imadpatti, P.S.-Chakia, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 325 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 272, 273, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016.

It has been alleged that three litres of illegal liquor has been recovered under a bench of one Arjun Das which is the place of shop of the petitioner.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38660 of 2019(2) dt.25-06-2019 2/2 before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 7th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 325 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T