Arbind Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31569 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2017 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Arbind Mahto son of Sonelal Mahto, resident of village -Hasanpur Surat, PS-Patory, District-Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 149 of 2017 registered for the offence(s) under section(s) 354(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with coaccused tried to drag the daughter of the informant and when the hulla was raised, they fled away.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village rivalry and no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and further he is in custody for more than three months and now the parties have settled the dispute outside the Court. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31569 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 149 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Mahesh/- U T