← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48969/2018bail rejected

Shashi Shankar Singh @ Mantu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-08-16Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48969 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1132 Year-2015 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== Shashi Shankar Singh @ Mantu, son of Rajendra Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Kajichak, P.S. Bhadaur, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shilpa Kumari, wife of Shashi Shankar Singh @ Mantu, resident of VillageKajichak, Post Office Khajurar, P.S. Bhadaur, District- Patna, presently living with her father, Parasnath of Village Dharampur, P.S. Bind, District Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1132C of 2015 registered under Sections 323, 341, 506, 379 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of A.C.J.M.-VI, Biharsharif, Nalanda. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the joint prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party no.2, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna, for settlement of dispute in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48969 of 2018(9) dt.16-08-2019 2/2 between the petitioner and the opposite party no.2, who are husband and wife, but the matter could not be settled. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T